Skip to main content

What are you planning to do, Mr President?


Days ago, my friend María Sanchez informed on Scoop Empire about the Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi's visit to Iran (Morsi's visit to Iran - the world is watching) and the reactions such a historical event has sparked/could spark.


Morsi will visit Iran within the framework of the holding of a Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement. The Movement was formally created in 1961 by prominent leaders of that time, Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser amongst them, with the aim of declaring themselves "neutral" and defend their sovereignty in everything that concerned Cold War-related events. After the end of the conflict, the group has struggled to find a common aim; as membership falls most of the times under the "third world" umbrella, development issues are normally discussed, as well as significant world events. It remains a key forum of dialogue in the international arena. The Movement's last Summit was held in Sharm El-Sheikh (Mubarak's darling resort) and the next one is already taking place in Tehran, where Morsi will pass the baton to Iran's President, the controversial Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

A lot has been speculated about the visit (Thomas Friedman has bluntly called it Morsi's wrong turn), moreover taking into account Egypt and Iran have stood on opposite sides over the last decades. To protest Egypt's signing of a peace treaty with Israel (and the subsequent recognition of the state), the Islamic Republic of Iran broke relations with Egypt in 1979. In addition to that, while Iran is one of the perpetual "rogue states", usual suspect for everything from terrorism to human rights violations in the eyes of the west, Egypt has been a key ally of the west for more than thirty years. Egypt is an Arab country, while Iran clings to its Persian roots. Egypt's population is mainly Sunnite, while Iran is a Shiite country. Yasser Ali, Egypt's President's spokesman, was quoted to say in his interview for Egypt’s state news agency MENA that President Morsi aims to restore the relations between both powers “based on shared interests, and expand areas of political coordination and economic cooperation because this will create a balance of pressure in the region”, adding the visit would last only a few hours, without any bilateral talks, and also dismissing speculation that Mr Morsi planned to upgrade Egypt’s relations with Iran to full diplomatic relations.

Rather, Morsi's main objective in visiting Tehran consists in introducing and gathering support for his own new Peace Plan for Syria, a blueprint he had already presented during the Organization for Islamic Cooperation Summit less than a month ago and which could avert the escalation of the Syrian infighting into a regional full-blown conflict. The initiative is centered on a committee of four that will also include Turkey and Saudi Arabia. (the reaction of the latter is extremely difficult to foresee). “We are determined to make this committee of four successful”, Yasser Ali said. Mr Morsi's intention during his current visit to China (besides luring foreign investment) is also trying to tackle the Syrian crisis (the Asian country is the last pillar of support for President Al-Assad, along with Iran and Russia). “Part of the mission is in China, part of the mission is in Russia and part of the mission is in Iran” he added. Iranian state news media has reported Iranian officials have publicly lauded the plan.

All of this clearly points to a change of tack, a set of actions that could help boosting Egypt's regional and international image and, in the end, help the country recovering its traditional leading role in the Arab World. Mr Ali underlined this "new and more robust approach". Other events have been viewed as signs of this new trend: the country's military's deploying of tanks in the Sinai Peninsula after the 5 August deadly attack (even though the Peninsula was demilitarized under the terms of the 1979 peace treaty), a heated activity in trying to reconcile Palestinian Factions (that has bore its fruits), a positive neutral diplomatic approach trying to solve the never-ending conflict between Sudan and South Sudan, and a more positive stance towards African countries (Morsi's first official foreign visit was actually to Ethiopia, where he attended the 15 July African Union Summit). 

Decades ago, Egypt was a vibrant cultural touchdown and political hub, but it has for years been viewed as a regional proxy of the U.S., as if it's foreign policy had been exclusively drafted by long-time allies. But, as the President's spokesman affirmed, "we’re not counted in any axis or any old groupings. Therefore, our minds are open for everyone, and our hands are extended to everyone". Egypt, even if keeping good relations with its traditional allies (Morsi will visit Washington next month) will now try to reach out to new partners, throughout not only the region, but the whole globe. The country is, however, as it has happened over the last months, still engulfed in trying to sort out its own transition, and it seems this new movement aims not to an immediate shifting of its foreign policy, but to a gradual consolidation of a more assertive stance.


All of this could eventually lead to a significant change of tide, that is to say, a reconfiguration of the regional and international politics of the region. It seems the West might better start to figure out what its stance towards the region after the "Arab Spring" should be ?




P.D. In this respect, do not miss Ricard Gonzalez's great article Egipto apuesta por un foro regional sobre el conflicto sirio que incluya a Irán.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What about Lebanon?

I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde

A Palestinian Spring?

I won't sum up the evolution and characteristics of the Arab Spring for you, you are all aware of them. I won't even enter into the debate on the term "Arab Spring" and its real meaning (at least, not now!). But I have to admit I really like the sound of it, moreover when it is used to add a new country to this encouraging domino effect movement, and that seems to be the case of Palestine. Nonetheless, this case presents a new surprising feature... It looks like one of the leaders of the country the events are taking place in is actually supporting the uprising!! So... who/what do the people go against (besides, as always, the Israeli occupiers)? Well, they are mainly demonstrating against the other visible authority of the Palestinian Authority. Wouldn't it be nice if I put names to all of these characters? A (key?) meeting of the Arab League was held last week in Cairo (President Morsi surprised us again with flammable declarations about Syria, he does se

Did you say "Syrian opposition"?

Weeks after the outset of the uprising, on August 2011, a new coalition named Syrian National Council (SNC) ( SNC´s web ) emerged as the single and main representative of the Syrian Opposition, following the Libyan example of the National Transitional Council (NTC), a group that gained international recognition as the legitimate governing authority in Libya and acted as such during and after the 2011 Libyan civil war, before handing power to an elected assembly on 8 August (actually, the Council was recognized by the NTC in Libya as the sole legitimate government of Syria). According to Wikipedia , the SNC was in principle a coalition of Syrian opposition groups (in principle: exiled Syrian wing of the   Muslim Brotherhood, Damascus Declaration, the   Assyrian Democratic Organization, the National Democratic Rally, the Local Coordination Committees of Syria, the Supreme Council of the Syrian Revolution, the Syrian Revolution General Commission, the Free Syrian