Skip to main content

A "rising star" approaches Gaza

On 16 October, Qatar (dubbed as a foreign policy "rising star" in the Arab World, as I will analyze over the next weeks) announced the launching of a $254 million plan to "rebuild and modernize Gaza", the biggest injection of aid the territory has received since the 2008 war with Israel. However, for Gaza remains under a controverted blockade, it seems the implementation of the scheme will need the cooperation of both Israel (who partially lifted the blockade in 2010) and Egypt (who has shown a somewhat incoherent stance concerning the famous tunnels), as they will have to allow the entrance of building materials and heavy machinery into the strip (instead of resorting to smuggling, like Palestinians in the Strip had to do before). The plan is aimed at improving Gaza's economic situation, badly damaged after the war and under the blockade: it will create thousands of jobs (the territory's unemployment amounts to approximately 30% of the population, and stands as one of the main reasons of what some have called a "Palestinian Spring"), valuable indispensable infrastructures (particularly regarding education and health) will be built, and electricity shortages will be alleviated. 


Ruling party Hamas (that still figures on the terrorist organizations' black list of most Western states) has warmly welcomed this decision as "a first drop of rain". Indeed, the political standing of the Islamist movement will undoubtedly benefit from the plan. Over recent months, much has been said about its rapprochement towards other (more moderate) political movements, particularly towards Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood (the Brothers have been the main supporters of an eventual "Palestinian Reconciliation"), and the consequent widening rift with Syria and its staunchest patron, Iran (coincidentally? longstanding enemy of both Qatar and Saudi Arabia). To that effect, Qatar's move could represent the first step towards the end of Hamas' (and thus Gaza's) isolation.

In order to uphold his country's stance, the Emir of Qatar Sheik Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani visited the Palestinian territory on 23 October, thus becoming the first Head of State to pay a visit to the Gaza Strip since Hamas won the 2007 elections that led to a war between the main Palestinian factions - Hamas itself and Fatah. The Qatari Delegation entered Gaza through Egypt (the latter accepted to open Rafah's border crossing for that purpose) and was received by scores of with people waving Qatari and Palestinian flags. As The New York Times reports, Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniya told the visitor: "today you are a big guest, great guest, declaring officially the breaking of the political and economic siege that was imposed on Gaza"; "today, we declare the victory on this siege through this blessed, historic visit".

However, the visit has deeply upset the Palestinian Authority, and particularly his President Mahmoud Abbas, that clearly emphasized on Al Quds "we call on the Qatari prince or his representative to visit the West Bank too!". The visit has also stressed the ongoing (irreconcilable?) differences between both factions, and is thus likely to jeopardise the chances of a reconciliation agreement being signed anytime soon, even though the authority called on Palestinian leaders to come to terms, for the deepening abyss is even "more painful than the Israeli aggression" (maybe he was hinting the resumption of negotiations towards a Doha Agreement II?). To some accounts, the visit even overrides the Palestine Liberation Organization's legitimacy as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.

It seems the visit has also infuriated Israel's authorities, though that's not big news: apparently, Yigal Palmor, a spokesman for Israel’s Foreign Ministry, declared that the emir had "thrown peace under the bus". Some have even dared to draw a connection between the visit and yesterday's events, whereby dozens of rockets were launched from Gaza into Israel. The latter counterattacked resorting to airstrikes, and four Palestinian militants were killed. Overnight, Egypt has proved again it is a key drive in the areas, brokering a (nonetheless fragile) ceasefire between Gaza and Israel.


P.D. It seems the visit has infuriated even more people, according to The Arabist: "this must be a difficult thing for Egypt to swallow: Qatar, which is lending $2bn this calendar year alone to support the Egyptian pound, is doing more politically and financially for Gaza than Muslim Brotherhood Egypt has".

P.D. 2 Other countries, like Turkey, may follow suit. Talking about who wants to lead the foreign policy debate in the Arab world?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What about Lebanon?

I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde...

Palestina: hoja de ruta, callejón sin salida

El 13 de septiembre se cumplió el vigésimosegundo aniversario de la firma de los   Acuerdos de Oslo , texto que marcó un antes y un después en el conflicto entre   Israel   y   Palestina . Para los israelíes, los acuerdos tenían por objeto garantizar a su población un cierto grado de seguridad, así como un socio con el que compartir mesa de negociación cada cierto tiempo. En el caso de los palestinos, los acuerdos fueron diseñados para proporcionarles un cierto margen de libertad política y económica y un horizonte de autogobierno.

El claro ganador de las presidenciales en Siria – y que no debería sorprendernos en exceso

Lo que al principio parecía una broma pesada se ha convertido en una realidad ineludible: Siria celebrará elecciones presidenciales el próximo 3 de junio, y todo apunta a que  Bashar Al Assad está en posición de declararse vencedor  de las mismas.  La única pregunta es ahora con qué margen . Independientemente de la utilidad de debates bizantinos sobre si estos comicios deberían tener lugar o no, lo cierto es que no resulta tan descabellado a día de hoy comparar, aunque salvando las distancias, los escenarios electorales en Siria y Egipto. A pesar de que ambos régimenes son perfectamente capaces de manipular los resultados, esto no será necesario, ya que una mayoría considerable de la población se muestra favorable a que un hombre fuerte siga dominando un país que aún se enfrenta a numerosas amenazas. Cartel electoral en Latakia / Foto: Flickr