Skip to main content

Settlement products are unethical goods


Do you know where a product you usually consume has been produced? Within the EU borders, you usually do. According to European legislation, the origin of many products has to be specified. But... what about the products with the label "Made in Israel"? That is a much more complicated issue, for these may have been manufactured in Tel Aviv, in Hebron, or in the Israeli Settlement of Ariel. European regulation lay down for which products it is required (notably fresh fruit and vegetables and a few other food products such as honey, olive oil and wine, as well as cosmetics) and for which it is not. Moreover, labelling is the responsibility of the merchant and not the producer. And merchants are often unaware of the issue of the settlements, as a result of which they fail to label these products correctly. This is going to change.

After months of procrastination, several EU Foreign Ministers have asked the HR Catherine Ashton to move forward with plans whereby consumer goods produced in Israeli settlements (including those in the Golan Heights) will have to present a special type of labeling distinguishing them from the rest of the products manufactured in Israel. So far, the Governments of the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (despite its being considered by Israel as one of its closest friends in Europe) were the only ones to have taken the unilateral decision of requiring goods made in settlements to make a reference to its exact origin. Even though the final aim would be to prohibit the sale of goods produced in the occupied territories, only those falsely labelled will be removed. The final decision will thus fall into the EU consumers' hands, many of them not aware of the fact that every year the settlers export some €250 millions worth of goods to Europe, whereas the Palestinians export just €15 millions worth of products. The decision will surely represent a major blow to bilateral trade, as according to the 1995 EU-Israel Association Agreement, products made in the occupied territories should not benefit from lower tariffs (it should be mentioned that the Israeli Finance Ministry compensates the exporters for the extra cost, though).

With this measure, the EU ministers seek to distinguish Israeli products manufactured within the borders established after the 1967 war (what we usually call the Green Line) of those who are made in Jewish settlements in Palestinian territory. This may seem like a small step for Palestine, but it is a huge leap for the EU and its foreign policy, for the EU finally has a clear position on settlement activity in the occupied territories. This move will undoubtedly put Europe on a confrontation course with Israel, but it seems the only current alternative, as the main issue blocking the resumption of any kind of peace talk is settlement policies. This may be the only way to remind Israel of the illegality of colonisation, stressing at the same time that human rights and democracy are pillars of the EU integration process.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What about Lebanon?

I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde

A Palestinian Spring?

I won't sum up the evolution and characteristics of the Arab Spring for you, you are all aware of them. I won't even enter into the debate on the term "Arab Spring" and its real meaning (at least, not now!). But I have to admit I really like the sound of it, moreover when it is used to add a new country to this encouraging domino effect movement, and that seems to be the case of Palestine. Nonetheless, this case presents a new surprising feature... It looks like one of the leaders of the country the events are taking place in is actually supporting the uprising!! So... who/what do the people go against (besides, as always, the Israeli occupiers)? Well, they are mainly demonstrating against the other visible authority of the Palestinian Authority. Wouldn't it be nice if I put names to all of these characters? A (key?) meeting of the Arab League was held last week in Cairo (President Morsi surprised us again with flammable declarations about Syria, he does se

Did you say "Syrian opposition"?

Weeks after the outset of the uprising, on August 2011, a new coalition named Syrian National Council (SNC) ( SNC´s web ) emerged as the single and main representative of the Syrian Opposition, following the Libyan example of the National Transitional Council (NTC), a group that gained international recognition as the legitimate governing authority in Libya and acted as such during and after the 2011 Libyan civil war, before handing power to an elected assembly on 8 August (actually, the Council was recognized by the NTC in Libya as the sole legitimate government of Syria). According to Wikipedia , the SNC was in principle a coalition of Syrian opposition groups (in principle: exiled Syrian wing of the   Muslim Brotherhood, Damascus Declaration, the   Assyrian Democratic Organization, the National Democratic Rally, the Local Coordination Committees of Syria, the Supreme Council of the Syrian Revolution, the Syrian Revolution General Commission, the Free Syrian