Skip to main content

Is Palestinian reconciliation finally moving forward?

By

You know I believe Palestinian reconciliation is vital if Palestinian politicians really want to create momentum for the Palestinian cause. Every once in a while, if we are attentive enough to the Arab media, we may read news about a new deal between Fatah and Hamas brokered by Cairo, thanks to improved relations between Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood (although many believe the bulk of the Peace Process and everything related to it still remains in the realms of the Egyptian General Intelligence Service/Mukhabarat). The latest news broke out on 15 May, whereby Fatah and Hamas had set a three-month timetable to form a unity government and organize elections to choose the members of the Parliament in exile of the Palestinian People, the Palestinian National Council (PNC), a key step in order to grant all decisions regarding the Palestinian struggle legitimacy.


The PNC should be the most important institution of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO), as it sets PLO policies and plans and its members in turn elect the Executive Committee of the organization. The PNC was established in 1948 and first PNC first met in Jerusalem in 1964 making a breakthrough, as it adopted the Palestinian National Charter and established the PLO as the political expression of the Palestinian people. At its 19th session in Algiers in 1988, the PNC unilaterally declared the independence of the Arab State of Palestine. It was the PNC that, after the signing of the Oslo agreements, conveyed in Gaza in 1996 (it did so again in 1998) to void parts of the Palestinian National Covenant that denied Israel’s right to exist. As of 2003, the PNC normally meets every two years and is composed of 669 members: the 88 members of the Palestinian Legislative Council (who, once elected, automatically become members of the PNC), 98 members from inside the Palestinian territories, and 483 members representing the Palestinian diaspora. .

It was announced that all reconciliation issues were going to be finalized in three months, that is by August (after the incredibly productive Ramadam). Officials even mentioned the issue of the crucial national unity government was set to be solved soon. Mahmoud Abbas already mumbled something about the start of talks on forming a unity government in April, after the controversial resignation of former Prime Minister Salam Fayyad. Once the composition of the government is resolved, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Abbas is to issue a presidential decree announcing the holding of parliamentary and presidential elections in the West Bank and Gaza, under the rules ofo a new electoral law both parties should have previously agreed on. A key meeting to thrust the process was scheduled to take place in Amman on 21 May. It was to be headed by the current PNC Chairman, Salim Zanoun. The problem is that both sides are incapable of reaching an agreement on issues they have been discussing for years. And neither seems ready to cede in the things they consider regard their own "red lines", mainly concerning their respective positions towards Israel and the Peace Process. But it is now beyond doubt that political interests and personal competition are also relevant ingredients of this extremely complicated formula.

What is clear is that, no matter what, the next government will be Mahmoud Abbas’ government, even if its members include ministers who belong to the Hamas-affiliated Change and Reform Bloc of the PLC. And that is something not everybody within Hamas is content with. In fact, Hamas made reconciliation efforts in the past even harder by never recognizing Fayyad’s authority as Palestinian premier. The new Prime Minister appointed this week by Abbas, although many believe he should have instead implemented right away the reconciliation agreement, does not seem satisfactory enough for the Islamist group. The latter wanted a politician they could rely on, someone understanding of their often radical stances, someone familiar with resistance. Instead they anew got a technocrat, an independent scholar educated in the UK and president of the most prestigious university in the West Bank (An Najah National University), Rami Hamdala. Through a spokesman, Hamas was swift to branded Hamdala's appointment "illegal", as it was not reviewed by the PLC. Palestinian officials responded by insisting the move will not obstruct the internal reconciliation efforts. This government should only last for three months and its main aim will be to pave the way for true national reconciliation with Hamas. Hamdallah has also pledged his commitment to Abbas's agenda of returning to the negotiating table to the dismay of many in Hamas and even Fatah, who call for the necessity of a complete halt in settlement activity. Will this time be THE time? Only time will tell...



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What about Lebanon?

By
I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde
Post a Comment
Read more

A Palestinian Spring?

By
I won't sum up the evolution and characteristics of the Arab Spring for you, you are all aware of them. I won't even enter into the debate on the term "Arab Spring" and its real meaning (at least, not now!). But I have to admit I really like the sound of it, moreover when it is used to add a new country to this encouraging domino effect movement, and that seems to be the case of Palestine. Nonetheless, this case presents a new surprising feature... It looks like one of the leaders of the country the events are taking place in is actually supporting the uprising!! So... who/what do the people go against (besides, as always, the Israeli occupiers)? Well, they are mainly demonstrating against the other visible authority of the Palestinian Authority. Wouldn't it be nice if I put names to all of these characters? A (key?) meeting of the Arab League was held last week in Cairo (President Morsi surprised us again with flammable declarations about Syria, he does se
Post a Comment
Read more

Did you say "Syrian opposition"?

By
Weeks after the outset of the uprising, on August 2011, a new coalition named Syrian National Council (SNC) ( SNC´s web ) emerged as the single and main representative of the Syrian Opposition, following the Libyan example of the National Transitional Council (NTC), a group that gained international recognition as the legitimate governing authority in Libya and acted as such during and after the 2011 Libyan civil war, before handing power to an elected assembly on 8 August (actually, the Council was recognized by the NTC in Libya as the sole legitimate government of Syria). According to Wikipedia , the SNC was in principle a coalition of Syrian opposition groups (in principle: exiled Syrian wing of the   Muslim Brotherhood, Damascus Declaration, the   Assyrian Democratic Organization, the National Democratic Rally, the Local Coordination Committees of Syria, the Supreme Council of the Syrian Revolution, the Syrian Revolution General Commission, the Free Syrian
Post a Comment
Read more