Skip to main content

To extradite or not to extradite: that's the UK's question

By
The UK Special Immigration Appeals Commission granted at the beginning of the week the appeal of Abu Qatada, a Muslim cleric and a controversial figure, believed to be part of Al Qaeda (some have even called him "Osama bin Laden's right-hand man in Europe"). The sentence allows him not to be extradited to Jordan, for the court considered he could not receive a fair trial in the latter country (citing the fact that Jordanian law allows the use of evidence gained as a result of torture), where he is accused of setting up terrorist attacks in 1999 and 2000 (he has been already convicted in absentia there). The cleric was thus released on bail yesterday, though subject to a 16-hout curfew (besides electronic tagging, a ban on Internet use and prohibitions on meeting some people). The thing is that even though the European Court of Human Rights [ECHR] (a very much moot body for many UK politicians) had already blocked his deportation, he was arrested in April to begin deportation.

The sentence is considered the latest in seven years of legal battles portrayed by his lawyers as a "crucial test of British justice proceedings". Indeed, Qatada was granted political asylum in 1994 (claiming that he had been tortured in Jordan), but was arrested in 2001 after the 9/11 attacks, even though he has never been formally charged with a crime in Britain. Later that year, he went into hiding but was arrested again in 2002 and held until March 2005 when he was released, after a House of Lords' judgment declared his detention without trial to be unlawful. In February 2009 the ECHR ordered UK to pay £2,500 in damages, for his imprisonment had violated the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights. In April 2008, a Court of Appeal decision blocked his deportation, but the decision was overruled in February 2009, when the House of Lords ruled that Qatada could be returned to Jordan.

The ruling is above all considered by many as a backlash to the British government, as British authorities have been seeking to deport him for years. Home Secretary Theresa May said the government would appeal Monday’s ruling, which was "deeply unsatisfactory": "Qatada is a dangerous man, the government has been doing everything it can to get rid of him, and we will continue to do so". Consequently, Ms May added they plan to overhaul the country's extradition laws. The court's sentence, however, seems to clash with the UK's government decision to send five suspects of terrorism to the U.S. (among them, the famous Egyptian cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri, now facing 11 charges, from calling for holy war in Afghanistan to attempting to set up a terrorism training camp in Oregon. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What about Lebanon?

By
I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Palestinian Spring?

By
I won't sum up the evolution and characteristics of the Arab Spring for you, you are all aware of them. I won't even enter into the debate on the term "Arab Spring" and its real meaning (at least, not now!). But I have to admit I really like the sound of it, moreover when it is used to add a new country to this encouraging domino effect movement, and that seems to be the case of Palestine. Nonetheless, this case presents a new surprising feature... It looks like one of the leaders of the country the events are taking place in is actually supporting the uprising!! So... who/what do the people go against (besides, as always, the Israeli occupiers)? Well, they are mainly demonstrating against the other visible authority of the Palestinian Authority. Wouldn't it be nice if I put names to all of these characters? A (key?) meeting of the Arab League was held last week in Cairo (President Morsi surprised us again with flammable declarations about Syria, he does se...
Post a Comment
Read more

Did you say "Syrian opposition"?

By
Weeks after the outset of the uprising, on August 2011, a new coalition named Syrian National Council (SNC) ( SNC´s web ) emerged as the single and main representative of the Syrian Opposition, following the Libyan example of the National Transitional Council (NTC), a group that gained international recognition as the legitimate governing authority in Libya and acted as such during and after the 2011 Libyan civil war, before handing power to an elected assembly on 8 August (actually, the Council was recognized by the NTC in Libya as the sole legitimate government of Syria). According to Wikipedia , the SNC was in principle a coalition of Syrian opposition groups (in principle: exiled Syrian wing of the   Muslim Brotherhood, Damascus Declaration, the   Assyrian Democratic Organization, the National Democratic Rally, the Local Coordination Committees of Syria, the Supreme Council of the Syrian Revolution, the Syrian Revolution General Commission, the Fr...
Post a Comment
Read more