Skip to main content

15 reasons not to observe Egypt's presidential election.

Now that both the EU and the Carter Centre have announced they will not be electoral observers (except that the EU will finally be) in the Presidential vote scheduled in Egypt for May 26th and 27th (coincidentally, elections will also take place around these days in the EU itself, Ukraine and Colombia), the tone is set for murmuring and gossipping. Although both organizations have cited different reasons behind their decisions, the truth is that many others seem to have pop up in our minds:


  1. "Administrative reasons" that have made it impossible to send key equipment to their team of monitors, or at least that is what the EU has alleged to justify its decision. While the EU hasn't said whether it believes that Egypt's authorities have deliberately undercut the mission, this decision is not usual at all. 
  2. Every time a country / organization speak out declaring their concern about the deteriorating situation, Egypt's authorities slam the statement as interference in the country's internal affairs. But they do want these entities to put their seals on this milestone, on this step back to square one.
  3. Other monitoring agencies haven't agreed to monitor the vote, stressing how little international legitimacy the presidential poll has left.
  4. Irregularities have been reported concerning the votes cast by Egyptian expatriates across the globe. In order to obtain a higher turnout, postal voting, as well as voting by migrants, Egyptian tourists and pilgrims have both been allowed.
  5. The Constitution, whose draft was completed by a 50-member committee that was far from demographically or politically representative, was approved in a referendum held in dubious conditions and presents a text that lays the foundations of a (yet again) repressive state in which no civilian right is guaranteed.
  6. No real electoral activity is taking place. Former Army Chief Abdel Fattah Al Sisi has not appeared in any election rallies and has restricted his campaign to television appearances and interviews. Nor does Sisi have a true electoral programme. In his nomination speech in March, he affirmed he wouldn’t have an electoral campaign in the traditional way. Even though the electoral programme has not yet been unveiled, his campaign officials insist that everybody knows the shape of the future as he imagines it, i.e. the issues it hinges on: countering terrorism, ending the security vacuum and developing the economy.
  7. Sisi, everybody's favourite to win the election, has pledged to complete a crackdown against the Muslim Brotherhood if elected. Since last August's massacre, hundreds of alleged MB supporters have been killed and more than 16,000 members of the Brotherhood and other Islamists have been arrested.
  8. There's only one alternative candidate, Hamdeen Sabahi, who's not exactly from the new generation and doesn't appear to have the slightest chance. Moreover, Sabahi has called Sisi the hero of the "2013 uprising" and also accuses the Muslim Brotherhood of being "politically responsible" for "terrorism" in Egypt. Not precisely an inclusive figure.
  9. Egypt is clearly being witness to a deteriorating human rights situation, particularly when it comes to the indiscriminate detention of political opposition and activists, many of those not belonging to the MB.  Dissent has been silenced, and academics, activists, and protesting college students keep being intimidated. For instance, Amr Hamzawy, one of Egypt's most prominent liberal politicians and intellectuals, was charged with insulting the judiciary for a tweet in which he criticised a court ruling against three US nonprofits that promote democracy. Many civil society organization, such as the Egyptian Center for Economic and Social Rights (whose offices were raided and members were arrested last December), have been harassed and threatened. Most importantly, a controversial protest law was passed last November, a regulation that has led to the arrest and convictions of thousands, notably activists Ala Abdel Fattah and Ahmed Maher. One example will suffice to prove this: according to Freedom House's democracy index, Egypt is either deteriorating or stalling on all measures.
  10. The climate has also hugely deteriorated for the press. It's not only about journalists being unable to reach out to Sisi campaign officials, but about a journalist, Abdullah Elshamy, on the verge of death by a 100-day hunger strike after being unfairly imprisoned for allegedly joining a terrorist group and spreading false news. Three other Al-Jazeera journalists are held in Egypt on trial for defamation and supporting Morsi's blacklisted Muslim Brotherhood, together with 17 other co-defendants, and are facing charges that have sparked an international outcry. It's also about innocent foreign journalists being beaten in demonstrations accused of disseminating lies in their countries about the purity of Egypt's transitional process. Right after the constitution was suspended on July 3rd, security forces preemptively closed down all Islamist broadcast outlets and raided their offices in a crackdown that led to the subsequent detention of several journalists. We should have guessed then.
  11. Egypt is nowadays an example of what could be called "selective justice". The world was utterly shocked last March when both the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Mohammed Badie, and 622 MB supporters were sentenced to death by the Minya criminal court, which handed down a final capital punishment ruling for 37 others. These had initially been sentenced to death after a trial lasting only a few days and were part of another group of 529 MB supporters, most of whom were jailed for life in the final sentencing. Both trials were not conducted properly, for each lasted two sessions without hearing the defence’s arguments. Even the public prosecutor thinks the mass death sentence trials were nonsense. Egypt's government says its judiciary is independent, and the worst bit is that it surely is: the Judges are setting themselves up as a symbol of what a (vocal) majority of the population believe, brainwashed by official statements, outright demagogy and state TV.
  12. Egypt's economy is in no better shape than it was before the coup. Subsidies on fuel and food are no longer sustainable, something that has become the norm in many countries across the region. Tourism and foreign investment are still quasi inexistent. The budget deficit is dangerously high. So is the unemployment rate, that threatens to bring Egyptians back on to the streets. In the meantime, while preaching austerity & sacrifices, the President salary is to increase by 950%, bonuses by 110%.
  13. Just take a look at Egypt's staunchest allies nowadays: Saudi Arabia and the Emirates. Not really examples of thriving democracies. Oh, and the United States, which despite its concerns over the situation, decided to partially resume (it was suspended after the July 3rd events) military aid to the Arab country, conveying a more than moot message about their commitment to democracy and basic values.
  14. It was not a Revolution but a coup. And which country in its right mind would want to grant legitimacy to this?
  15. There's still hope for Egypt.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What about Lebanon?

I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde...

Palestina: hoja de ruta, callejón sin salida

El 13 de septiembre se cumplió el vigésimosegundo aniversario de la firma de los   Acuerdos de Oslo , texto que marcó un antes y un después en el conflicto entre   Israel   y   Palestina . Para los israelíes, los acuerdos tenían por objeto garantizar a su población un cierto grado de seguridad, así como un socio con el que compartir mesa de negociación cada cierto tiempo. En el caso de los palestinos, los acuerdos fueron diseñados para proporcionarles un cierto margen de libertad política y económica y un horizonte de autogobierno.

El claro ganador de las presidenciales en Siria – y que no debería sorprendernos en exceso

Lo que al principio parecía una broma pesada se ha convertido en una realidad ineludible: Siria celebrará elecciones presidenciales el próximo 3 de junio, y todo apunta a que  Bashar Al Assad está en posición de declararse vencedor  de las mismas.  La única pregunta es ahora con qué margen . Independientemente de la utilidad de debates bizantinos sobre si estos comicios deberían tener lugar o no, lo cierto es que no resulta tan descabellado a día de hoy comparar, aunque salvando las distancias, los escenarios electorales en Siria y Egipto. A pesar de que ambos régimenes son perfectamente capaces de manipular los resultados, esto no será necesario, ya que una mayoría considerable de la población se muestra favorable a que un hombre fuerte siga dominando un país que aún se enfrenta a numerosas amenazas. Cartel electoral en Latakia / Foto: Flickr