Skip to main content

Syrian conflict: a sensible offer

By
It seems Syria, entering the third year of what many consider an all-out war that has taken the lives of more than 70,000 people, may have found a way to get out of the stalemate the country has been plunged into for months. That is, of course, if the main stakeholders in the conflict deign to relent and to do what's actually best for the state and its desperate population, the one who have been bearing the hugest brunt, as well as for its neighbors, most of them on the brink of deeper civil infighting.

While in Moscow, where talks with his staunchest ally (aka Russia)'s counterpart were scheduled, and also while scud missiles were reportedly launched in Aleppo, the country's Foreign Minister has declared its Government is ready for talks with whoever wants to, talks in which the armed rebels (he literally mentioned "those who have weapons in their hands) would be authorized to participate in, thus relinquishing one of the regime's main preconditions. Even though he did not offer specifics, his proposal could well represent the first step towards a negotiated transition. And he was right when he mentioned that reforms will never be achieved through bloodshed. As I have repeatedly said, this conflict will only be put an end to through comprehensive dialogue.

The Syrian opposition, still incredibly fractured as the latest Arab League meeting has shown, seems to be waiting for more, though, and most of his members, particularly amongst the SNC, have already bluntly dismissed the proposal as empty and deceitful, following the pattern of what happened weeks ago, when an offer for talks was completely rejected by the regime. Moreover, the coalition has threatened to boycott forthcoming international conferences/meetings tackling the Syrian issue, notably the next "Friends of Syria" Summit (in my opinion, the most inclusive and viable forum so far) due to take place in Roma, denouncing what they consider a worrying lack of compromise within the international community. It certainly would be a shame if extremists within the opposition succeed in hijacking the process and thus denying it any hope of peaceful resolution.

An optimistic turn of events has to be stressed, though. And that would be a shift of the US stance, towards more engagement and bigger efforts in trying to work out an agreement, symbolised by recent hints in the behaviour of new Secretary of State John Kerry, who is due in the region this week. That could spur shifts in other Western countries' stances, and even in those of Syria's neighbours that have appeared somewhat hesitant as of lately, notably Turkey and Saudi Arabia (which apparently has not completely stop its facilitating weapons to rebels).


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What about Lebanon?

By
I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Palestinian Spring?

By
I won't sum up the evolution and characteristics of the Arab Spring for you, you are all aware of them. I won't even enter into the debate on the term "Arab Spring" and its real meaning (at least, not now!). But I have to admit I really like the sound of it, moreover when it is used to add a new country to this encouraging domino effect movement, and that seems to be the case of Palestine. Nonetheless, this case presents a new surprising feature... It looks like one of the leaders of the country the events are taking place in is actually supporting the uprising!! So... who/what do the people go against (besides, as always, the Israeli occupiers)? Well, they are mainly demonstrating against the other visible authority of the Palestinian Authority. Wouldn't it be nice if I put names to all of these characters? A (key?) meeting of the Arab League was held last week in Cairo (President Morsi surprised us again with flammable declarations about Syria, he does se...
Post a Comment
Read more

Did you say "Syrian opposition"?

By
Weeks after the outset of the uprising, on August 2011, a new coalition named Syrian National Council (SNC) ( SNC´s web ) emerged as the single and main representative of the Syrian Opposition, following the Libyan example of the National Transitional Council (NTC), a group that gained international recognition as the legitimate governing authority in Libya and acted as such during and after the 2011 Libyan civil war, before handing power to an elected assembly on 8 August (actually, the Council was recognized by the NTC in Libya as the sole legitimate government of Syria). According to Wikipedia , the SNC was in principle a coalition of Syrian opposition groups (in principle: exiled Syrian wing of the   Muslim Brotherhood, Damascus Declaration, the   Assyrian Democratic Organization, the National Democratic Rally, the Local Coordination Committees of Syria, the Supreme Council of the Syrian Revolution, the Syrian Revolution General Commission, the Fr...
Post a Comment
Read more