Skip to main content

Elections in Israel: the outcome. What might the Palestinian territories expect?

The introduction on the elections can be found here.

According to most forecasts, incumbent Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu's alliance won the parliamentary elections, and its leader duly claimed (a humbling) victory. But, as almost no one predicted, the process leading to the formation of a new government has not been as smooth as he would have liked, for the second place was surprisingly awarded to a complete newcomer, Yair Lapid, and his party Yesh Atid ("There is a future"). Naftali Bennett's "Jewish House Party" also did well, although not as well as expected. Moreover, both centrist and leftist parties made significant gains. Meanwhile, far-right parties did not fare as well as polls had indicated. The outcome also showed a new generation is being given shape to, for young voters voted for new candidates that repeatedly publicly denounced their being tired of the never-changing "old regime" of Netanyahu, Lieberman, Barak and the likes. Maybe I was wrong and there is hope in Israel after all? (maybe I shouldn't act so hastily this time either)

So, the results announced by the Electoral Commission shed a virtual tie in the number of seats won by the right and the left-wing blocks. Which partners will Mr Netanyahu was going to choose to enter into a coalition with? A significant part of the voters shown they want change, was Bibi going to listen to their demands and yield in certain milestones of his political stance, such as security and foreign policy? Since day one, he conceded he will have to pledge reform on economic and social issues, as Mr Lapid had hinted he was ready to enter into talks if Netanyahu engaged in social reform leading to the improvement of a weary welfare system. Nonetheless, Israel's PM also affirmed he will remain steadfast in everything concerning regional issues, thus implicitly promising an ongoing stalemate of the Arab-Israeli conflict. He will for sure keep on being particularly worried about Iran's nuclear programme, a concern shared by almost every candidate. However, and even if the campaigns did not say so, security and stability remain the primary concern for all, both politicians and voters.

Finally, after weeks of nail-biting and political bickering, Netanyahu has finally announced who the members of his "dream team" will be. He has done so after asking for an extension, but before welcoming President Obama, who is due in the country next week. Bibi, who will also assume the Foreign Affairs portfolio for a while, and Lieberman will enter into a coalition with two centrist parties: Yesh Atid and Hadnua. A far-right formation, Hayehudi, will also be part of the next Government, and will surely press for settler's rights, moreover if we take into account its leader, Naftali Bennet, will be granted the post of Economy minister and his party will control the Housing ministry. Surprisingly, though, Netanyahu has decided not to ally with long-time accomplices ultra-orthodox parties this time, and for the first time since 1977, probably bearing in mind the struggles he has been forced to go through during the last legislature as a result of these parties' intransigent stance on many issues. One of these issues is the future of haredim (ultra-orthodox dedicated to study the sacred texts) individuals, a cause Yair Lapid has been publicly fighting for. The latter wants, amongst other things, this growing population to pay taxes and serve in the army, as the rest of the Israeli people do, and many predict he will get his way thanks to his being appointed Finance minister.

Nevertheless, there is still hope for Palestinians. Even though "rising star" Benett, who's shown too hawkish an stance for his age, bluntly rejects any kind of negotiations with the Palestinians, for he opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state in the West Bank, man of the year and TV Star Lapid has repeatedly said he is looking forward to a revival of the Middle East Peace Process. And, above all, Netanyahu has somewhat given breathing space to the dove of peace by appointing centrist Tzipi Livni (who won the 2009 elections but failed to form a coalition), practically the only one who did speak out about the need to revitalize the peace process, Minister of Justice and exclusive negotiator with the Palestinians. Should the talks resume, that is.

The new coalition is likely going to be a weak one, though. For one, it will only comprise 68 of the Knesset's 120 seats, and will need help from other parties when passing vital laws and adopting critical measures. On the other hand, it is an heterogeneous group, whose stances regarding key files are deeply opposed. Only time will tell, as always, what the future may bring for Palestine.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What about Lebanon?

I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde

A Palestinian Spring?

I won't sum up the evolution and characteristics of the Arab Spring for you, you are all aware of them. I won't even enter into the debate on the term "Arab Spring" and its real meaning (at least, not now!). But I have to admit I really like the sound of it, moreover when it is used to add a new country to this encouraging domino effect movement, and that seems to be the case of Palestine. Nonetheless, this case presents a new surprising feature... It looks like one of the leaders of the country the events are taking place in is actually supporting the uprising!! So... who/what do the people go against (besides, as always, the Israeli occupiers)? Well, they are mainly demonstrating against the other visible authority of the Palestinian Authority. Wouldn't it be nice if I put names to all of these characters? A (key?) meeting of the Arab League was held last week in Cairo (President Morsi surprised us again with flammable declarations about Syria, he does se

Did you say "Syrian opposition"?

Weeks after the outset of the uprising, on August 2011, a new coalition named Syrian National Council (SNC) ( SNC´s web ) emerged as the single and main representative of the Syrian Opposition, following the Libyan example of the National Transitional Council (NTC), a group that gained international recognition as the legitimate governing authority in Libya and acted as such during and after the 2011 Libyan civil war, before handing power to an elected assembly on 8 August (actually, the Council was recognized by the NTC in Libya as the sole legitimate government of Syria). According to Wikipedia , the SNC was in principle a coalition of Syrian opposition groups (in principle: exiled Syrian wing of the   Muslim Brotherhood, Damascus Declaration, the   Assyrian Democratic Organization, the National Democratic Rally, the Local Coordination Committees of Syria, the Supreme Council of the Syrian Revolution, the Syrian Revolution General Commission, the Free Syrian