Skip to main content

Is Egypt as rich as people believe it is?

Every time people cite Egypt's economic distress in front of an Egyptian, he most probably will bump retorting that this economic problems are surely due to political mismanagement, as Egypt is an incredibly resource-rich country which could one day reach the level of brethren Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia or wealthy countries in the region such as Israel? I have to say I, undoubtedly influenced by History courses about the incomparable Egyptian Empire, have always believed that fact. Until now. This week-end I found what I consider an enlightening article on the issue.

"While there are several pieces of evidence to suggest that there is some squandering taking place, there is little or no evidence to suggest that the resources that Egypt has are nearly enough to help the country make a significant progress.
First, let us again re-list some simple facts. Egypt is predominantly desert with only 4% of its total land area cultivated and settled in.  Poverty rates hover above 26% with over 70% of rural area inhabitants below the poverty line.
Second, if we examine key revenue drivers from non taxation activities, we find that the Suez Canal and tourism combined can reach $20bn per annum. To put this figure in perspective, that is less than the revenue made by Wal-Mart in one month!
Third, on the demand side, the country is gripped by a growing population and swelling consumerism. For instance, per-capita consumption of wheat is currently at about 182 kilograms. A figure which was less than 110 kilograms in the 1960s when Egypt had less than half of its current population.  On the energy front, Egypt also imports about 14 million tonnes, or about 40%, of its petroleum and fuel products each year; the pressures are massive with energy subsidies making up as much as 30% of Egypt’s government spending. Despite all the political turmoil of the past 3 years in the search for democratic reform, Egypt can’t eat democracy!
Fourth, Egypt is a country without a cohesive economic plan. The country is not structurally geared to provide high levels of prosperity to its citizens. In the Global Competitiveness Index, Egypt has been consistently performing poorly in areas related to macroeconomic stability and labour market efficiency. So, as long as most Egyptians dread free market strategies and believe that their welfare is best promoted by nationalised monopolies and big governments, not much is going to change; and as long as privatisation and liberalisation continue to be considered taboos, Egypt’s economy will continue to decline and ordinary Egyptians will languish in extreme poverty.
To sum it up, the fact remains that Egypt is a poor, overpopulated country with limited resources compared to its inhabitants. The perpetual state of denial is making matters even worse. The myth of a resource-rich country may have held well at the times of the Pharaohs, but a country which is not and will not be self sufficient for most of its needs, must think beyond this antiquated rhetoric and devise a plan".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What about Lebanon?

I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde...

Palestina: hoja de ruta, callejón sin salida

El 13 de septiembre se cumplió el vigésimosegundo aniversario de la firma de los   Acuerdos de Oslo , texto que marcó un antes y un después en el conflicto entre   Israel   y   Palestina . Para los israelíes, los acuerdos tenían por objeto garantizar a su población un cierto grado de seguridad, así como un socio con el que compartir mesa de negociación cada cierto tiempo. En el caso de los palestinos, los acuerdos fueron diseñados para proporcionarles un cierto margen de libertad política y económica y un horizonte de autogobierno.

El claro ganador de las presidenciales en Siria – y que no debería sorprendernos en exceso

Lo que al principio parecía una broma pesada se ha convertido en una realidad ineludible: Siria celebrará elecciones presidenciales el próximo 3 de junio, y todo apunta a que  Bashar Al Assad está en posición de declararse vencedor  de las mismas.  La única pregunta es ahora con qué margen . Independientemente de la utilidad de debates bizantinos sobre si estos comicios deberían tener lugar o no, lo cierto es que no resulta tan descabellado a día de hoy comparar, aunque salvando las distancias, los escenarios electorales en Siria y Egipto. A pesar de que ambos régimenes son perfectamente capaces de manipular los resultados, esto no será necesario, ya que una mayoría considerable de la población se muestra favorable a que un hombre fuerte siga dominando un país que aún se enfrenta a numerosas amenazas. Cartel electoral en Latakia / Foto: Flickr