"The Muslim brotherhood has experienced two major waves that have risen
and fallen. The first wave was in 1928 in its original launch by group
founder Hassan el-Banna and then the ruthless crackdown of president
Nasser beginning in 1954. The second wave started in 1971 with the
release of their leaders from imprisonment, and ended this year with the
collapse of Morsi’s rule and the subsequent crackdown" (via Nervana, who else?).
Visiting Scholar for the Carnegie Middle East Center´s Sami Moubayed has got it all right. His magnificent article Brahimi won´t risk his reputation in vain highlights the poignant truth about of one of the most serious mistakes the international community (and particularly both the UN and the League of Arab States) has made since the breaking out of the conflict: choosing the wrong mediator. And taking into account the many many (many) things at stake, it really shocks me why nearly nobody stressed that fact earlier. Appointing an special envoy to show unity/consensus and be able to speak to Assad? Great idea. Not bearing in mind what was exactly needed? Failure. Even though he will have to face several setbacks, let´s only hope Brahimi´s appointment somehow clears the path of the Syrian mess... His advantages, as presented by Moubayed: He is "the man who helped end Lebanon’s civil war, who managed Iraq’s troubled post-Saddam elections, and propped up Hamid Karza...
Comments
Post a Comment