Skip to main content

Syrian conflict: a sensible offer

By
It seems Syria, entering the third year of what many consider an all-out war that has taken the lives of more than 70,000 people, may have found a way to get out of the stalemate the country has been plunged into for months. That is, of course, if the main stakeholders in the conflict deign to relent and to do what's actually best for the state and its desperate population, the one who have been bearing the hugest brunt, as well as for its neighbors, most of them on the brink of deeper civil infighting.

While in Moscow, where talks with his staunchest ally (aka Russia)'s counterpart were scheduled, and also while scud missiles were reportedly launched in Aleppo, the country's Foreign Minister has declared its Government is ready for talks with whoever wants to, talks in which the armed rebels (he literally mentioned "those who have weapons in their hands) would be authorized to participate in, thus relinquishing one of the regime's main preconditions. Even though he did not offer specifics, his proposal could well represent the first step towards a negotiated transition. And he was right when he mentioned that reforms will never be achieved through bloodshed. As I have repeatedly said, this conflict will only be put an end to through comprehensive dialogue.

The Syrian opposition, still incredibly fractured as the latest Arab League meeting has shown, seems to be waiting for more, though, and most of his members, particularly amongst the SNC, have already bluntly dismissed the proposal as empty and deceitful, following the pattern of what happened weeks ago, when an offer for talks was completely rejected by the regime. Moreover, the coalition has threatened to boycott forthcoming international conferences/meetings tackling the Syrian issue, notably the next "Friends of Syria" Summit (in my opinion, the most inclusive and viable forum so far) due to take place in Roma, denouncing what they consider a worrying lack of compromise within the international community. It certainly would be a shame if extremists within the opposition succeed in hijacking the process and thus denying it any hope of peaceful resolution.

An optimistic turn of events has to be stressed, though. And that would be a shift of the US stance, towards more engagement and bigger efforts in trying to work out an agreement, symbolised by recent hints in the behaviour of new Secretary of State John Kerry, who is due in the region this week. That could spur shifts in other Western countries' stances, and even in those of Syria's neighbours that have appeared somewhat hesitant as of lately, notably Turkey and Saudi Arabia (which apparently has not completely stop its facilitating weapons to rebels).


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Migrating

By
Aunque el título pueda referirse a uns de las varias mudanzas a los que me conocéis personalmente estáis acostumbrados, se refiere simplemente a este humilde blog, que tantas alegrias me ha dado. A partir de ahora podréis encontrar todos mis artículos en la página https://discoveringmena.blog Although the title could well refer to one of the rushed and unpredictable decisions those amongst you who know me are by now you used to, 'migrating' refers here to the new site this humble blog - which has given me so much joy - is moving to. From now on you can find all of my articles on the page https://discoveringmena.blog
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Brahimi is a much better fit for Syria

By
Visiting Scholar for the Carnegie Middle East Center´s Sami Moubayed has got it all right. His magnificent article Brahimi won´t risk his reputation in vain  highlights the poignant truth about of one of the most serious mistakes the international community (and particularly both the UN and the League of Arab States) has made since the breaking out of the conflict: choosing the wrong mediator. And taking into account the many many (many) things at stake, it really shocks me why nearly nobody stressed that fact earlier. Appointing an special envoy to show unity/consensus and be able to speak to Assad? Great idea. Not bearing in mind what was exactly needed? Failure. Even though he will have to face several setbacks, let´s only hope Brahimi´s appointment somehow clears the path of the Syrian mess... His advantages, as presented by Moubayed: He is "the man who helped end Lebanon’s civil war, who managed Iraq’s troubled post-Saddam elections, and propped up Hamid Karza...
Post a Comment
Read more

What about Lebanon?

By
I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde...
Post a Comment
Read more