Skip to main content

Rage breaks out in Palestine

A worrying, although too familiar, bout of violence has erupted in the West Bank, over the death of a Palestinian prisoner in Israeli custody. Although Israel denies any kind of wrongdoing in the face of accusations of torture by the victim-s interrogators, Palestinian authorities have called for an international objective inquiry into this death.


In what some may consider the onset of a third Intifada, angry Palestinians have been burning tires and throwing stones at Israeli troops, who have in turn responded with tear gas and rubber bullets, for days. The IDF has even resorted to live ammunition, injuring two teenagers on Monday, when further protests were organised in Hebron after the burial of the "marthyr", and thus spurring even more violence in the Eastern Palestinian territory, and the launching of a rocket in Gaza, the first after the November ceasefire. Israeli officials have also publicly shown their deep concern over the escalation, and Prime Minister Netanyahu has forgot for a while the formation of a new government and has ordered the release of frozen tax funds collected last month, thus temporarily putting an end to the main reprisal Israel threatened with after Palestine was granted non-member observer state status by the UN General Assembly

Moreover, approximately 3,000 Palestinian prisoners, amongst the 4,500 Israel is said to hold in its prisons on charges spanning from stone/throwing to terrorist activities, held a one-day hunger strike out of solidarity. At the beginning, demonstrations were organized for the release of four of them (two were rearrested months after their release in the 2011 prisoner exchange that freed Gilad Shalit), who have been in hunger strike for months, stressing the ordeal many inmates have to go through, notably including arbitrary detention, extrajudicial imprisonment and the systematic use of torture by Israeli security forces that has been evidenced by international watchdogs such as Human Rights Watch. According to Middle East Monitor, the death of Arafat Jaradat could have been the last straw, and may well thrust the Palestinian Authority (if Mahmoud Abbas ask for the state's signing of the Rome Statute, that is) to take Israel to the International Criminal Court over crimes against Palestinians.

The despair of the Palestinians is completely understandable. It's a dire rage not only directed against their occupier, but also against their own failing authorities. Many elements add to the already serious preoccupations that led to widespread protests and to what some called a "Palestinian Spring": the announcement of construction activity in the "untouchable" E1 area, a round of elections in Israel that has for the most part ignored their plight, a certain feeling of being outshined by Gaza's inhabitants, a growingly blunter stance by settlers, the arrests of released prisoners from the Shalit deal... Palestine appears to be a spark away from a third uprising, and Israel is only making this outcome more plausible...   


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Migrating

Aunque el título pueda referirse a uns de las varias mudanzas a los que me conocéis personalmente estáis acostumbrados, se refiere simplemente a este humilde blog, que tantas alegrias me ha dado. A partir de ahora podréis encontrar todos mis artículos en la página https://discoveringmena.blog Although the title could well refer to one of the rushed and unpredictable decisions those amongst you who know me are by now you used to, 'migrating' refers here to the new site this humble blog - which has given me so much joy - is moving to. From now on you can find all of my articles on the page https://discoveringmena.blog

What about Lebanon?

I would never dare to think I have enough knowledge so as to freely talk about this issue and produce a meaningful article, but I will try to write down what I have understood so far (I already had to edit as I misunderstood some facts, thanks Louis!). Lebanon and Syria have always been deeply interconnected. Both countries were part of the Ottoman Empire, both countries were under the dominance of France's colonization, both countries share an extremely complicated ethnic/religious division, and both countries political scenes still depend on the other's. More recently, Syria was a key player in the brokering of the 1989 Taif Accords putting an end to Lebanon's civil war, and its troops (and many authorities) stayed in the country (allegedly guaranteeing the non resumption of violence) until 2005, when the country's population unanimously demanded their retreat. It all started in Tripoli, Lebanon's second largest city, next to the country's northern borde...

Why Brahimi is a much better fit for Syria

Visiting Scholar for the Carnegie Middle East Center´s Sami Moubayed has got it all right. His magnificent article Brahimi won´t risk his reputation in vain  highlights the poignant truth about of one of the most serious mistakes the international community (and particularly both the UN and the League of Arab States) has made since the breaking out of the conflict: choosing the wrong mediator. And taking into account the many many (many) things at stake, it really shocks me why nearly nobody stressed that fact earlier. Appointing an special envoy to show unity/consensus and be able to speak to Assad? Great idea. Not bearing in mind what was exactly needed? Failure. Even though he will have to face several setbacks, let´s only hope Brahimi´s appointment somehow clears the path of the Syrian mess... His advantages, as presented by Moubayed: He is "the man who helped end Lebanon’s civil war, who managed Iraq’s troubled post-Saddam elections, and propped up Hamid Karza...